[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: JDO
- To: "Per Nyfelt" <per.nyfelt@nordicwave.com>,<ozone-dev@ozone-db.org>
- Subject: RE: JDO
- From: Falko Braeutigam <falko@smb-tec.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:31:12 +0200
- Delivered-To: softw7-ozone-db:org-ozone-dev@ozone-db.org
- In-Reply-To: <NOEMKKABAMMNIALHIPOHIEOCCEAA.per.nyfelt@nordicwave.com>
- Organization: SMB
- References: <NOEMKKABAMMNIALHIPOHIEOCCEAA.per.nyfelt@nordicwave.com>
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Per Nyfelt wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ozone-dev-owner@ozone-db.org
> > [mailto:ozone-dev-owner@ozone-db.org]On Behalf Of Falko Braeutigam
> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:06 PM
> > To: ozone-dev@ozone-db.org
> > Subject: RE: JDO
> >
> > The questions is: what is the goal of JDO. Will it become the Persistence
> > manager for EJB (I was told it will not but I'm still not sure)
> > or will it be
> > an independent, more OO centric approach. If the later is true, then we
> > definitely should try to support it.
> >
> Right this is an important point. To me it is also whether the support for
> JDO means the Ozone app server quality will disappear and in the JDO view it
> will only be a storage area with some query facilities. I'm a little
> confused what the JDO spec is saying, it seems somewhat ambiguous to me.
> I'll look into Connectors some more and see if I can figure out a way to
> implement it unless you already have some ideas?
no. looking forward your insights ;)
Falko
--
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JDO
- From: Joel Shellman <joel@ikestrel.com>