[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: some question about OODBMS,JDO,J2EE EJB
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Per Nyfelt wrote:
> I would but I want to finish the XML:DB api support in Ozone first and that
> has just started, so it will be a while until I can get involved in the
> deployment aspects. Interesting subject though - a more controlled
> deployment structure similar to what is common in the j2ee world might allow
> us to attack the problematic workarounds with class evolution that goes
> beyond and cannot be addressed using serialVersionUID.
>
> So much fun to do and so little time...
indeed :)
Falko
>
> Best regards,
> Per
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ozone-dev-owner@ozone-db.org
> > [mailto:ozone-dev-owner@ozone-db.org]On Behalf Of Falko Braeutigam
> > Sent: den 12 maj 2001 12:14
> > To: ozone-dev@ozone-db.org
> > Subject: Re: some question about OODBMS,JDO,J2EE EJB
> ...
> >>
> > All this sounds great and most, if not all, of the above ideas have been
> > discussed already. We now just need someone who puts all this together
> > in a proposal and actually implements it.
> >
> > I'm able to look into adopting dynamic proxies for ozone. I'm
> > probably most
> > suited for this job anyway. Dynamic proxies would help to
> > simplify the entire
> > deployment of ozone apps. However, it makes no sense to work on this
> > without having someone taking care of the other parts of the deployment
> > process. Anybody interested in helping here?
> >
> >
> > Falko
> > --
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Falko Braeutigam mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
> > SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com
> >
> >
--
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com