Re: Ozone & EJBs

• To: Jay Abraham <ejb700@yahoo.com>, ozone-users@ozone-db.org
• Subject: Re: Ozone & EJBs
• From: Falko Braeutigam <falko@smb-tec.com>
• Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:56:34 +0100
• Delivered-To: softw7-ozone-db:org-ozone-users@ozone-db.org
• In-Reply-To: <20010105043557.27897.qmail@web5104.mail.yahoo.com>
• Organization: SMB
• References: <20010105043557.27897.qmail@web5104.mail.yahoo.com>

On Fri, 05 Jan 2001, Jay Abraham wrote:
> How is Ozone intended to be used with Application
> Servers for EJB based J2EE applications?  I notice
> that the J2EE framework seems to focus on RDBMS 
> and ORDBMS datasources with hardly any mention of
> ODBMS datasources.

I did check this with Mark Fleury of jBoss some time ago. And we did indeed
come to the conclusion that ozone is to container-ish itself to be easily used
as a simple data source for a container. Since ozone provides RMI,
transactions, permissions already it seems that ozone itself could be a
container. But as you mentioned J2EE focuses on RDBMS. A benchmark of EJB
compared to ozone could help to see if an OO container could provide any
advantages over a RDBMS container. Any EJB experiences out there?


Falko
-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam                              mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
SMB GmbH                                        http://www.smb-tec.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Ozone & EJBs
    • From: "Per Nyfelt" <per_nyfelt@hotmail.com>

• References:
  • Ozone & EJBs
    • From: Jay Abraham <ejb700@yahoo.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: User disappears
• Next by Date: Re: No AdminImpl_Proxy
• Prev by thread: Ozone & EJBs
• Next by thread: Re: Ozone & EJBs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread