----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 1:17
PM
Subject: RE: Very Urgent !!
----------
From: Knapp, Robert (CAP,
CMC)[SMTP:ROBERT_KNAPP@MORTGAGE.GE.COM]
Sent: Friday, January 19,
2001 1:17:10 PM
To:
'ozone-users@ozone-db.org'
Cc: lee@insight.rr.com
Subject:
RE: Very Urgent !!
Auto forwarded by a Rule
[snip]
This should be the last
question I have for today. ;)
> > Do you see any issue using prowler in this
way?
> Basically not but this depends on what the
queries are. If
> it's SQL, then you
> are fast but you will stick with RDBMSs. If you plan to
use
> XPath, then you
>
are completely independent of the underlying datastore but
> it's very very
> very hard to find a
good SQL->XML mapping and tool
> configuration
that performes
> well.
Would it be possible to do a one-off for the SQL-XML
mapping?
In otherwords, is the architecture of Prowler
such that my
team can say "Ok, this is the mySQL
schema and this is
what the xml needs to look like..."
and write a specific
driver(for lack of a better word)
for that particular schema?
It seems like that would enhance performance
significantly,
and is something we were already
prepared to do anyway. [Doing such
gives the added
advantage of being able to customize each schema
to
the best configuration for each db. ]
Last question, really... well for today, but
there may be a rush of postings at midnight. :)
RobK