Re: Problems running "simple" with the 0.4

• To: ozone-users@ozone-db.org
• Subject: Re: Problems running "simple" with the 0.4
• From: Falko Braeutigam <falko@softwarebuero.de>
• Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:41:14 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <20000202101302.13454.qmail@web2003.mail.yahoo.com>
• Organization: SMB
• References: <20000202101302.13454.qmail@web2003.mail.yahoo.com>

On Wed, 02 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> running the local version of the 'simple' demo i get
> the following exception, while the client version work
> ok.
Yes, yes, yes, yes... I did only implement the connection pool for
*RemoteDatabase* yet. Right now I'm working on the LocalDatabase version.

BTW: This is one of the new features. When using RemoteDatabase ozone maps
clients threads/transactions to server threads. Each thread pair uses its own
socket connection. So threads run *completely* independent (except for general
lock stuff of course).

I will do the same for the LocalDatabase version. This allows ozone to scale
very well with the number of threads that uses the server. So there is no
longer the need to use several RemoteDatabase instances to connect the same
database. Nor do we need to use RemoteDatabase instead of LocalDatabase for
scalability reasons.


Falko
-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam                         mailto:falko@softwarebuero.de
softwarebuero m&b (SMB)                    http://www.softwarebuero.de

• References:
  • Problems running "simple" with the 0.4
    • From: Davide Mora <d_mora@yahoo.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: while I have your attention..
• Next by Date: PATCH: SAXParser.java
• Prev by thread: Problems running "simple" with the 0.4
• Next by thread: Re: ozone 0.4-dev2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread