Re: DxDictionary

• To: <ozone-users@ozone-db.org>
• Subject: Re: DxDictionary
• From: Falko Braeutigam <falko@softwarebuero.de>
• Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:15:05 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <00c001bf8ccb$ca29a5c0$ef3965c1@gurkensalat.interface-business.de>
• Organization: SMB
• References: <00c001bf8ccb$ca29a5c0$ef3965c1@gurkensalat.interface-business.de>

On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, guettli wrote:
> >%_I am searching DxDictionary, too.
> I think you don't need it to run ozone.
> But it would be nice, if you
> can compile the examples without changing
> them.

I just greped the entire source tree: there is no DxDictionary. 

It's a good idea to switch to the new 0.4 version no matter what. It's faster,
cleaner, straighter, better... ;) The more people working with it the faster it
becomes real stable.

BTW: on weekend I was able to run a 1000000 objects benchmark on ozone without
any problems! :) Very small objects, highly structured object graph; database
size was 300M. Linux seems to handle larger numbers of files pretty well.


Falko
-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam                         mailto:falko@softwarebuero.de
softwarebuero m&b (SMB)                    http://www.softwarebuero.de

• References:
  • Re: DxDictionary
    • From: "guettli" <guettli@gmx.de>

• Prev by Date: Re: DxDictionary
• Next by Date: Ozone
• Prev by thread: Re: DxDictionary
• Next by thread: Ozone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread