[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PJDOM

b/c it's super lightweight comparing to W3C DOM:

1. classes vs. interfaces
2. fast performance (close to SAX as they say)
3. simplified memory model for XML documents
4. lower memory consumtion
5. using Java 2 Collections API, like ODMG => easier to implement in Ozone

Anyway, it's just an idea...

Lars Martin wrote:

> Sun, 30 Apr 2000 Zvi wrote:
> >do you heard about JDOM ?
> >I think that JDOM can be made persistent using Ozone, much better than
> >standard DOM.
>
> Why do you think that JDOM would be much better than standard W3C DOM?
> Performance? Memory consumption? Clearer API?
>
> Regards,
> Lars
> --
> ________________________________________________________________
> Lars Martin                         mailto:lars@softwarebuero.de
> softwarebuero m&b (SMB)              http://www.softwarebuero.de