[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: eXelon performance
Good job falko. Now the real trick is to try and match eXelons indexed
speed. It can do the huge search in a fraction of a second which normaly
takes 11 secs unindexed. If you could pull that off, Wow, ozoneXML and
prowler would be real killer apps for XML. Not that they are not cool
already, but you know what I mean. Once again, good job on the performance
improvement. .3s is a huge improvement.
-david
> David and all, here are some news from the XML XPath performance front.
>
> With Xt instead of Xalan and the new directly-invoke-in-VM-call-proxies
> ozoneXML needs 0.4s for the above XPath query! (warm database
> cache) This is
> much more comparable to the eXelon performance reported by David
> (around 0.3s;
> probably warm but I'm not sure) than the 11s reported for ozoneXML/Xalan.
>
> Seems that we are on the right track here :)