[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Am Mittwoch, 30 Mai 2001 schrieben Sie:

>So in the end - if I insist that I want freedom to refactor mercylessly 
- I
>will have to get data to some form of intermediate format. Like 
a RDBMS or
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ozone-users-owner@ozone-db.org
>[mailto:ozone-users-owner@ozone-db.org]On Behalf Of Gerd Mueller
>Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:35 PM
>To: ozone-users@ozone-db.org
>Subject: Re: Upgrading ozone applications
>Am Wednesday 30 May 2001 09:42 am schrieben Sie:
>> Ok, that sounds pretty useful.
>> Has it been tried for more advanced refactoring schemes than just 
>> and removing fields.
>No, none of the points below. And I guess it wouldn't work, since 
you may
>two objects where one is expected. What happens with references 
to object
>Cv1 ? Does they point after loading to Cv2 or B or what ? Those 
>have to be splitted too. At the moment I've got no idea how to handle 
>> Say that an object C in version 1 has been split into two objects: C
>> version 2 and B.
>> How would one handle that ?
>> Or worse that objects C1 and B1 has been put in to one single 
big object
>> ?
>Best Regards,
>Gerd Mueller                                   mailto:gerd@smb-tec.com
>SMB GmbH                                        http://www.smb-tec.com