[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: JDO and OODBMS
JDO would be nice. Lets see how the spec pans out once there is a reference
implementation.
-david
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Falko Braeutigam [mailto:falko@softwarebuero.de]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 11:01 AM
> To: ozone-users@ozone-db.org
> Subject: Re: JDO and OODBMS
>
>
> Charles, thanks for the info.
>
> On Thu, 08 Jun 2000, Charles Benett wrote:
> > Ozonies,
> > FYI. There's an article on Java Data Objects and both relational and
> > object-oriented databases at www.javareport.com. Looks like some
> > commercial OODBMS vendors are involved. Any ideas how ozone will react/
> > fit in?
> I'm not yet sure. What do the others think?
>
> We have to check the actual API of JDO to find out
> 0. If anybody needs ozone/JDO?
> 1. If we are able to support JDO with ozone.
> 2. If yes, do we loose some of special benefits of the ozone architecture.
> 3. If we are able to provide a fast JDO implementation on top of ozone.
>
> To answer these questions we have to discuss many points. One of
> them is that
> JDO supports a query language and IMO every query lang othen than the
> underlaying programming lang (Java in our case) permits us to reach the
> goal of closing the impedance mismatch between app and database logic.
>
> Other ideas?
>
>
> Falko
> --
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Falko Braeutigam mailto:falko@softwarebuero.de
> softwarebuero m&b (SMB) http://www.softwarebuero.de
>