[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: JDO and OODBMS
On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, David Duddleston wrote:
> JDO would be nice. Lets see how the spec pans out once there is a reference
> implementation.
Castor claims to be JDO. But I was told that there is not to much to see
actually. Anybody familiar with Castor's JDO?
Falko
>
> -david
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Falko Braeutigam [mailto:falko@softwarebuero.de]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 11:01 AM
> > To: ozone-users@ozone-db.org
> > Subject: Re: JDO and OODBMS
> >
> >
> > Charles, thanks for the info.
> >
> > On Thu, 08 Jun 2000, Charles Benett wrote:
> > > Ozonies,
> > > FYI. There's an article on Java Data Objects and both relational and
> > > object-oriented databases at www.javareport.com. Looks like some
> > > commercial OODBMS vendors are involved. Any ideas how ozone will react/
> > > fit in?
> > I'm not yet sure. What do the others think?
> >
> > We have to check the actual API of JDO to find out
> > 0. If anybody needs ozone/JDO?
> > 1. If we are able to support JDO with ozone.
> > 2. If yes, do we loose some of special benefits of the ozone architecture.
> > 3. If we are able to provide a fast JDO implementation on top of ozone.
> >
> > To answer these questions we have to discuss many points. One of
> > them is that
> > JDO supports a query language and IMO every query lang othen than the
> > underlaying programming lang (Java in our case) permits us to reach the
> > goal of closing the impedance mismatch between app and database logic.
> >
> > Other ideas?
> >
> >
> > Falko
> > --
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Falko Braeutigam mailto:falko@softwarebuero.de
> > softwarebuero m&b (SMB) http://www.softwarebuero.de
> >
--
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam mailto:falko@softwarebuero.de
softwarebuero m&b (SMB) http://www.softwarebuero.de