[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: JDO and OODBMS
There is some comparisions to JDO and OMDG in the PDF slide show at the
following...
JavaTM Data Objects Architecture (JDO), Transparent Interface for Persistent
Data Storage
Heiko Bobzin, POET Software
http://jsp.java.sun.com/javaone/javaone2000/event.jsp?eventId=1603&ts=959786
977637
JavaTM Data Objects Specification, Overview
Craig Russell, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://jsp.java.sun.com/javaone/javaone2000/event.jsp?eventId=700&ts=9597870
11024
I don't think JDO is real OODBMS centric, but it is more than the Castor
folks would like.
-david
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zvi [mailto:thezvi@ifrance.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 11:52 AM
> To: ozone-users@ozone-db.org
> Subject: Re: JDO and OODBMS
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> if JDO is OODBMS centric, then what's the dif. between JDO and ODMG Java
> binding?
>
> Zvi
>
> David Duddleston wrote:
>
> > > The most important advantage of a standard is that it is a
> > > "standard". Giving
> > > something a name is not enough. Am I wrong here? ;)
> >
> > Very, very true. This is why I'm excited about it. I just hope
> the spec gets
> > adapted and is easy to use.
> >
> > > Anyway, from what I have seen of JDO it doesn't look that OODBMS
> > > centric. What
> > > especially prevents a RDBMS mapping tool like Castor to implement JDO?
> >
> > Here is a comment for Arkin on JDO.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: arkin@arkin.exoffice.com [mailto:arkin@arkin.exoffice.com]On
> > > Behalf Of Arkin
> > >
> > > I'll be talking to Sun during JavaOne but I can't promise anything.
> > >
> > > Basically Castor and JSR-12 attempt to do the same thing, but while
> > > Castor is more RDBMS centric, JSR-12 is too OODBMS centric. That means
> > > some minor conflicts and incompatibilites in the API. If we can sort
> > > them out in a future version of JSR-12 then we can certainly
> make Castor
> > > compatible with it.
> > >
> > > arkin
> >
> > -david
>