[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Object Creation in ozone

To: ozone-users@ozone-db.org
Subject: Re: Object Creation in ozone
From: Falko Braeutigam <falko@smb-tec.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:21:12 +0200
In-Reply-To: <01f701c0060e$e389c6a0$e894b8d4@joda>
Organization: SMB
References: <F242DA1XuZi0me3abTd000018c7@hotmail.com> <39982299.23A8B071@incenter.org> <01f701c0060e$e389c6a0$e894b8d4@joda>

On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Carl Rosenberger wrote:
> [Callbacks onCreate, onDelete]
> > I think they should be stubs, not abstract.  Not all database objects need
> this behaviour.  Just document it :)
> 
> I support Tims opinion.

Hmmm.. I'm not yet sure. Both solutions have pros and cons. Other votes/ideas?


Falko
-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam                              mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
SMB GmbH                                        http://www.smb-tec.com

References:
- Re: Object Creation in ozone
  - From: "Don Berendsen" <donberendsen@hotmail.com>
- Re: Object Creation in ozone
  - From: Tim Brown <tim@incenter.org>
- Re: Object Creation in ozone
  - From: "Carl Rosenberger" <carl@db4o.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal: New XML Storage Engine
Next by Date: Re: Object Creation in ozone
Prev by thread: Re: Object Creation in ozone
Next by thread: Re: Object Creation in ozone
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread