[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: extensible ozone API
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, thomas.strauss@philips.com wrote:
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas Strauss/HBG/MS/PHILIPS on 23.10.2000 09:51 ---------------------------
>
>
> thomas.strauss@germanynet.de on 22.10.2000 21:08:50
> To: Thomas Strauss/HBG/MS/PHILIPS@EMEA1
> cc:
> Subject: Re: extensible ozone API
> Classification:
>
> Hi
>
> I thing for the described situation something like a virtual constructor
> would be a good situation. The context for the usage is known and therefor
> the type is known in advance.
What is a "virtual constructor"? How would the client code look like using such
a thing?
>
> Maybe the type information could be transfered with an tagging interface.
Can you explain more?
Falko
--
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com