[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: extensible ozone API
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, thomas.strauss@philips.com wrote:
> One difference is that the method is static.
Ok, since we always have a database connection object (ExternalDatabase),
which can act as a factory, this wouldn't be a win, right?
Falko
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> falko@softwarebuero.de@SMTP@ozone-db.org on 24.10.2000 10:08:47
> Please respond to ozone-users@ozone-db.org@SMTP
> Sent by: ozone-users-owner@ozone-db.org
> To: ozone-users@ozone-db.org@SMTP
> thomas.strauss@germanynet.de@SMTP
> cc:
> Subject: Re: extensible ozone API
> Classification:
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Thomas Strau? wrote:
> > Hello Falko,
> >
> > the Virtual Constructor is e.g. in Scott Meyers More Effective C++: Item 25
> > described. In C++ this looks like:
> I read this book some years ago when we started to make the WipeOut IDE. In
> fact, at this time it was something like my bibel. ... and today i don't even
> remember virtual ctors... :( ;)
>
> Anyway, a vctor seems to be more or less exactly the same than my service()
> method, which _is_ a vctor because it constructs different types of objects
> depending on the input. Am I right?
>
>
> Falko
> --
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Falko Braeutigam mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
> SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com
--
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com