[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: why not use castor-xml.jar?

To: george stewart <georgestewartiv@yahoo.com>,ozone-users@ozone-db.org
Subject: Re: why not use castor-xml.jar?
From: Falko Braeutigam <falko@smb-tec.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 18:14:43 +0100
Delivered-To: softw7-ozone-db:org-ozone-users@ozone-db.org
In-Reply-To: <20010304025713.7819.qmail@web10113.mail.yahoo.com>
Organization: SMB
References: <20010304025713.7819.qmail@web10113.mail.yahoo.com>

On Sun, 04 Mar 2001, george stewart wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Why doesn't the ozone distribution use the
> castor-xml.jar instead of the full castor.jar?
> 
> With castor 9.0, castor-xml.jar is 559 kb versus 1,134
> kb for castor.jar.

AFAIK there is no particular reason. It just worked for us so we keep using it.
I'm not even sure about the version of the castor.jar in the ozone CVS. Maybe
this version did not provide castor-xml.jar. 

Falko
-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam                              mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
SMB GmbH                                        http://www.smb-tec.com

References:
- why not use castor-xml.jar?
  - From: george stewart <georgestewartiv@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: LocalDatabase and multiple threads in Servlet environment
Next by Date: XML database usage
Prev by thread: why not use castor-xml.jar?
Next by thread: XML database usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread