[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JDO and OODBMS
Hi all,
if JDO is OODBMS centric, then what's the dif. between JDO and ODMG Java
binding?
Zvi
David Duddleston wrote:
> > The most important advantage of a standard is that it is a
> > "standard". Giving
> > something a name is not enough. Am I wrong here? ;)
>
> Very, very true. This is why I'm excited about it. I just hope the spec gets
> adapted and is easy to use.
>
> > Anyway, from what I have seen of JDO it doesn't look that OODBMS
> > centric. What
> > especially prevents a RDBMS mapping tool like Castor to implement JDO?
>
> Here is a comment for Arkin on JDO.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: arkin@arkin.exoffice.com [mailto:arkin@arkin.exoffice.com]On
> > Behalf Of Arkin
> >
> > I'll be talking to Sun during JavaOne but I can't promise anything.
> >
> > Basically Castor and JSR-12 attempt to do the same thing, but while
> > Castor is more RDBMS centric, JSR-12 is too OODBMS centric. That means
> > some minor conflicts and incompatibilites in the API. If we can sort
> > them out in a future version of JSR-12 then we can certainly make Castor
> > compatible with it.
> >
> > arkin
>
> -david